If you’ve applied for a grant from the State of Maryland, you know how fragmented the procedure can be. The process is so daunting that some Saltzberg Consulting clients have decided not to apply, because the value of the grants wasn’t worth the time and effort.
The State is not trying to suppress applications. But the process has simply become unwieldy: Every State agency does their own thing, and sometimes what one agency is asking for contradicts (or at least doesn’t conform to) what another agency is requesting. Sometimes even within the same State agency , there will be no uniformity of application or reporting guidelines.
Hampered by unnecessary paperwork and requirements, the current process burdens State agencies and nonprofits alike. Not only is the application process painful, the excessive complexity often impairs or interferes with the delivery of services and use of funds.
Saltzberg Consulting, Maryland Nonprofits, and many nonprofit organizations in Maryland support two bills being considered by the General Assembly this session. Senate Bill 630 and House Bill 1539 would establish a new Council, along with working groups, to streamline the State grant-making process. Their goal would be to standardize the application, reporting, and budgetary formats, while providing enough flexibility to account for the size and scope of particular grant programs, grant-making entities, and grantees. Elise Saltzberg, founder of Saltzberg Consulting, has volunteered for one of the working groups.
Not surprisingly, this is a BIG task that will take years to implement. If the bills are passed this session, the new Council will submit annual reports to the General Assembly starting in December 2021 and submit all its recommendations to the General Assembly and the Department of Budget and Management by July 1, 2024.
In February and March, Elise provided written and oral testimony to the Senate Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee and written testimony for the House Health and Government Operations Committee. To listen to oral testimony – both pro and con – given before the Senate committee, visit this page and click the camera icon beside the committee name. The video will be cued automatically to testimony for Senate Bill 630, which runs for about 30 minutes.
These bills have the potential to improve quality of life in Maryland, by freeing State money from the constrictions of red tape and putting it to work helping Maryland residents. We’re optimistic that these bills will pass into law and look forward to updating you accordingly.
Left to Right: State Senator Cheryl Kagan, Maryland Nonprofits’ Director of Public Policy Henry Bogdan, and Elise Saltzberg testifying before the Senate Education, Health, and Environment Committee
Elise’s February 27, 2020 testimony to the
Senate Education, Health, and Environment Committee in favor of SB0650:
Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony on behalf of my Maryland nonprofit clients. I have worked as a fundraising consultant to nonprofit organizations in Maryland since 2000, and I usually have 10-12 clients going at a time. Most Saltzberg Consulting clients are smaller nonprofits, with annual budgets in the range of $250,000 to $4 million.
Every year, at least four or five of my clients are confronted with a dilemma: The State has issued an RFP to provide funding for a program similar to something that they already offer or would like to offer. The first thought is, “Wow – this is GREAT” and we are flying high! Then we take a closer look at the RFP and the air is let out of the balloon. The RFP is 65 pages long. The amount of information that they are requiring is completely ridiculous and we have to submit it in a format that we’ve never encountered before, even though we’ve applied for funding from this same State agency in the past. The budget templates are 12 pages long and in a format that doesn’t match up with how we were required to create our line item budget last year for a different State agency. And the due date is in 30 days. Yikes!
So, then we have to perform a cost-benefit analysis around whether or not we should apply for the funding. Is it going to be worth the hassle to spend 60-80 hours putting together this grant application for the amount of money that we might be awarded? And if it’s awarded, is it going to be worth the time and effort that it will take to comply with all the grant monitoring and reporting requirements? Unfortunately, more often than it should, the answer to these questions is NO, and we end up forgoing the opportunity to apply.
Since my clients pay me by the hour, the time that we spend putting together an application such as the one described above can add up to thousands of dollars. And those dollars count towards their dreaded “administrative overhead,” which no funder wants to cover. Most importantly, this is time and money that my nonprofit clients would much rather devote towards delivering their services to Marylanders in need.
Standardizing the grant application and grant reporting formats across State agencies would be a blessing. Nonprofit organizations would be in a much better position to expend their limited resources towards operating their programs and delivering their services instead of expending them on completing needlessly complex jigsaw puzzles. As a bonus, I anticipate that streamlining the grant application and grant reporting processes will save the State agencies the headache of creating and re-creating RFP’s, forms, and web portals, and the time they spend monitoring grant awards.
Thank you again for the opportunity to present this testimony.
Elise’s March 10, 2020 testimony to the House Health and Government Operations Committee in favor of HB 1539:
Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony on behalf of my Maryland nonprofit clients. I have worked as a fundraising consultant to nonprofit organizations in Maryland since 2000. Most Saltzberg Consulting clients are smaller nonprofits, with annual budgets in the range of $250,000 to $4 million.
Every year, at least four or five of my clients are confronted with a dilemma: The State has issued an RFP to provide funding for a program similar to something that they already offer or would like to offer. The first thought is, “Wow – this is GREAT” and we are flying high! Then we take a closer look at the RFP and the air is let out of the balloon. The RFP is 65 pages long. The amount of information that they are requiring is completely ridiculous and we have to submit it in a format that we’ve never encountered before, even though we’ve applied for funding from this same State agency in the past. The budget templates are 12 pages long and in a format that doesn’t match up with how we were required to create our line item budget a few months ago for a different State agency. And the due date is in 30 days. Yikes!
So, then we have to perform a cost-benefit analysis around whether or not we should apply for the funding. Is it going to be worth the hassle to spend 60-80 hours putting together this grant application for the amount of money that we might be awarded? And if it’s awarded, is it going to be worth the time and effort that it will take to comply with all the grant monitoring and reporting requirements? Unfortunately, more often than it should, the answer to these questions is NO, and we end up forgoing the opportunity to apply.
Since my clients pay me by the hour, the time that we spend putting together an application such as the one described above can add up to thousands of dollars. And those dollars count towards their dreaded “administrative overhead,” which no funder wants to cover. Most importantly, this is time and money that my nonprofit clients would much rather devote towards delivering their services to Marylanders in need.
Establishing a Council that would focus on standardizing the State grants process across agencies is a wonderful opportunity to find places where both grant application and grant reporting formats could be streamlined. A Council such as this one – made up of stakeholders from all sectors – would be a great way to examine the current landscape and look for ways to improve it, and I would be happy to serve on such a Council. In 2009-2010, I was the Nonprofits Representative to the Online Applications Working Group of Project Streamline , which was an effort by the Grants Management Council to do something similar for private foundations. That work carries on at PEAK Grantmaking ( https://www.peakgrantmaking.org/principles-for-peak-grantmaking/project-streamline/), which found that both grant-seekers and grant-makers benefitted from the process.
Similarly, with government grants, I anticipate that streamlining the grant application and grant reporting processes will save State agencies the time and energy of creating and re-creating RFP’s, forms, and web portals, as well as the time and energy they spend monitoring grant awards. And nonprofit organizations would be in a much better position to expend their limited resources towards operating their programs and delivering their services instead of expending them on completing needlessly complex jigsaw puzzles.
Thank you again for the opportunity to present this testimony.